Critique the Criticism

Skeeter’s mother was a mix of Hilly and Elizabeth. She is constantly critiquing Skeeter, just like Elizabeth does to Mae Mobley. However it was more affectionate and a bit more sympathetic. However, overall, I found her to be an unsympathetic character. The way she treated Constantine was unforgivable and she was not supportive of Skeeter. 

I believe that a mother should always be supportive of her children. In the article "Can Supportive Moms Enhance Your Brain" is has been found that a nurturing parent can enhance the development of a growing child. Children who's mothers comforted them in a time of stress were found to have a smaller rate of depression later on in life. 


There is one distinct point in the novel where Skeeter's mother is supportive, and it is very hypercritical. She tells Skeeter not to let a boy change her. Throughout the novel, however, Skeeter's mother is pressuring Skeeter to change for men. In my opinion, there needs to be a mix of support and criticism to make a good mother. We are constantly hearing of a mother who is over critical, or not encouraging her child enough. A mother has been through all the experiences which her child may or may not experience as well. Instead of the word criticize, I would you critique. By critiquing the things a child may do, you are instilling a positive outcome. Criticizing may be interpreted as judgement, which a child should never receive. 

http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/can_supportive_moms_enhance_your_brain

Making a Difference

It is often wondered if one person can make a difference. There is no doubt in my mind that a singular human being can make an essential difference. In the novel My Sister's Keeper, there is one person in particular whom I believe made a remarkable difference-- Campbell Alexander, attorney at law. When Anna ambled into his office, he did not seem very promising to make a breakthrough in her case. However, by the end of the book, Campbell Alexander changed the course of one girl's life forever. By winning the case for medical emancipation, Campbell gave Anna the chance to grow up as a normal teenage girl. If the two of them hadn't been in a catastrophic accident, Anna's life would have drastically changed. One person fought for her happiness, and made a tremendous difference. 

In an article titled "Why I Love Being a Lawyer," one person states the following..

"Why do I love being a lawyer? Because, once in a while, you get the opportunity to help someone who desperately needs your help. It feels good to be that person."

D.A. “Duke” Drouillard

Omaha, Neb.

It is no doubt possible that one person can help another individual immensely. Another individual who made a difference in the novel was Anna. Without Anna, Kate would not have survived past a very young age. And I do not mean survive as in medically live. I mean, survive. Anna acted as a middleman for the entire Fitzgerald family. Anna made Kate laugh and smile, allowing Kate to see the good in life; not only the draining sickness that was overcoming her family. Anna made a huge difference in the lives of her family members. Without Anna, none of them would have been able to see the light at the end of the dark tunnel. 

http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/why_i_love_being_a_lawyer/

Seeing is Believing

One of the best qualities about My Sister's Keeper, in my opinion, is the way Jodi Picoult does not monopolize one point of view. Instead of narrating the novel through purely Anna's eyes, which would create a bias, she touched on each family member's thoughts and ideas. The first chapter of the book begins with Anna. A thirteen year old girl going through some intense internal, along with external, conflict. Reading on to the second chapter, a new narrator emerges. Cambell Alexander, the attorney to soon represent Anna for her medical emancipation, is slightly less vulnerable than a thirteen year old girl. By changing the narration, Picoult was able to portray the manner of which each character copes with conflict. 

With each new narrator, my opinion would slightly vary. Reading from Anna's point of view, I started off despising Sara. I thought, "what kind of mother neglects her children?" Although she may neglect Anna to some degree, she is doing everything in her power to keep her other daughter alive. Reading Jesse's point of view gave me the greatest sadness. Seeing how Jesse tried to make a difference for his family, and went unnoticed, brought back my hatred for Sara. I thought one of the hardest parts was when he was sitting with Julia in his room, telling her about the Christmas that Kate spent in the hospital. By cutting down a tree, and decorating it so that their spirits would be uplifted walking in the front door Christmas morning, he expected some sort of recognition. Instead, he got a toy car bought in the hospital gift shop. 

His narration of this scene is devastating by the way he's telling this story, as if it were a every-day-thing, to this woman he just met. 

Changing up the viewpoints may keep the story fresh, and entertaining. Jodi Picoult incorporating many subplots into My Sister's Keeper, making it a prime candidate for multiple viewpoints. Adding in Julia and Cambell kept the story going with a young love memory interfering with getting the job done efficiently. Creating multiple view points may be hard for many authors, but I believe Picoult executed this technique very well. 

http://www.the-writers-craft.com/point-of-view-in-literature-perspectives.html